This came up in our mathematical physics class. It is often said that quantum mechanical states are described by vectors in Hilbert space. This, however, is slightly inaccurate, since any scalar multiple of a vector describes the same state. Therefore, strictly speaking, quantum mechanical states are actually described by “rays” in Hilbert space. Despite this, it seems that one still needs the whole Hilbert space to do quantum mechanics — one cannot do it by using “rays” alone. In Geroch’s words, we have to “drag the vectors through the mud” in order to do quantum mechanics, and it is not clear why this is the case.
February 25, 2007 at 5:17 pm |
In my opinion, one needs whole Hilber space exactly because “things interfere”. If you have only a space of rays – projective Hilbert space – you cannot add points of this space and accordingly you can’t have a model for interference.
February 25, 2007 at 7:24 pm |
[...] in Hilbert space” Here’s an interesting post: Why do we need the whole Hilbert space?, at the The truth makes me fret blog. The author makes an interesting point: quantum mechanical [...]
February 25, 2007 at 7:39 pm |
sirix: That sounds about right.
December 4, 2007 at 5:20 pm |
I have a similar question pending: in an alternative to Hibert space,s, I worked with the orthocomplemented lattices (a introduced by G. Birkhoff and J. Von Neumann in 1936) to solve socio-economic and human related probabilistic issues.
To comply with my cases, I had to complement the lattices of G. Birkhoff and J. Von Neumann such that the description of my systems remain complete at anytime (see the page http://www.handson-om.net/v3-geometrical-foundation-holotomy.htm)
I apparently managed so to comply with my issues in this fashion – but still I know that I should have been able to work out my issues with in an Hilbert space – as both Hilbert spaces and orthocomplemented lattices should be equivalent.
From the work I did (I suggest that you visit the site if you like to know more ) I suspect that the answer to your question might be that there is a unique Hilbert space that may embody all the cases and problems of every one.
My work has an experiential base from where I progressively develop the theoretical tools that I need – and still I need to confirm the proposition I gave you here – and you may suggestions on it.
Our work is accessible at http://www.handson-om.net/v310-index.htm
Best regards
Paul